Russian energy giant Gazprom claims ‘significant methodological errors’ in EU antitrust charges
OAO Gazprom officials argued at an oral hearing Tuesday that European Union antitrust charges against the Russian energy giant are “groundless and based on significant methodological errors,” Gazprom said.
The move, requested by the Russian company, indicates it is using every legal avenue to defend itself against the EU’s charges, which were filed in April after a multiyear investigation. Companies are entitled to request an oral hearing to better make their case to regulators but don’t always request one.
A spokeswoman for the European Commission confirmed the hearing took place Tuesday “in line with standard antitrust procedures.” The hearing was closed to the public, but Gazprom provided its statements in an email to The Wall Street Journal.
The Gazprom delegation, led by its Deputy Chairman Alexander Medvedev, sought to convince the European Commission that it was mistaken in alleging the Russian company had hindered competition and charged unfair prices for gas in Eastern Europe. In particular, Gazprom said it disagreed with the EU’s conclusions over its “excessive pricing” of gas and presented data to show why the allegations were “economically and legally unfounded.”
It also argued the EU had failed to take properly into account that its commercial agreements were determined by intergovernmental agreements with Russia.
Gazprom said it was committed to an “open dialogue” with the EU and wanted to find a “mutually acceptable solution.”
The hearing follows talks last week between EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager and officials from Gazprom and Russia’s government. Ms. Vestager has said her agency is pushing ahead with the charges at the same time as it considers a settlement offer from Gazprom.
source: wsj.com
Latest Posts
- Serbia, The real plans of the Jadar project
- Eurasian Resources Group highly commends the publication of the Critical Raw Materials Act
- Rio Tinto has spent more than a million euros on land in Serbia at the proposed site of a lithium mine that was eventually cancelled a year ago
- A new grievance mechanism for Chinese overseas mining needs to be free to use
- Europe revives mining to reduce dependence on the import of key raw materials, supply from Serbia as competitive choice
Popular Post
- Serbia, The real plans of the Jadar project
- Europe revives mining to reduce dependence on the import of key raw materials, supply from Serbia as competitive choice
- First Quantum Minerals, Roaring Back to Life thanks to sale of Kevitsa nickel-copper-platinum mine in Finland
- Outokump’s Kemi chrome mine in Finland targeting carbon neutrality by 2025
- Erin Ventures boron Piskanja project in Serbia, drilling report updates
- Zidjin opens the “Chukaru Peki” mine in Serbia in the next two years
- Rio Tinto Ultra lithium mining project in Serbia
- Avala Resources shareholders invited to approve transaction with Dundee, copper-gold projects in Serbia
- What Are The Major Natural Resources Of Macedonia?
- How valuable is Kosovo’s mineral wealth?