6.2 C
Belgrade
14/12/2024
Mining News

Europe continues to buy products from Russia’s dirtiest companies

With the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the European Union has begun to reduce trade relations with Russia by banning or restricting the import and export of various goods. The volume of exports from Russia to the EU from February to December of 2022 fell by 51%, but there is still potential for an even greater reduction in imports. At the same time, the most popular Russian products in the EU are produced by enterprises that are not only closely connected with the state, but that also heavily pollute the environment.

A closer look at the structure of imports to the EU from Russia shows that some goods were not affected by the sanctions and the EU countries continued to buy them in 2022. Among them are:

Supported by

oil and oil products (restrictions were imposed, including a ban on the import of crude oil and oil products by sea, sanctions against certain companies, a price ceiling for the transit of crude oil from Russia to a third country)

natural gas (restrictions have been imposed, including a ban on the import of liquid natural gas by sea, sanctions against certain companies);

coal (a ban was imposed on the import of coal from Russia from August 2022);

copper (no restrictions);

aluminum (no restrictions);

nickel (no restrictions);

fertilizers (ban on imports of potash fertilizers, sanctions against certain companies);

steel and products from it (restrictions were imposed on the import of iron and steel, as well as on some types of finished products of the steel industry, sanctions against certain companies);

silver and platinum group metals (no restrictions);

products of the chemical industry, inorganic oxides; precious and semi-precious stones (no restrictions)

The EU continues to be one of the main importers of fossil fuels of Russian origin even a year after the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. During the year of war and efforts to reduce Russian imports of hydrocarbons, EU countries managed to completely abandon only coal.

Thus far, there have been no restrictions imposed on the import of non-ferrous metals from Russia to the EU. In 2021, the EU imported 150,000 tons of nickel, and from January to November 2022, 144,000 tons. But even in the absence of official sanctions, some European companies began to independently abandon the products produce by Norilsk Nickel, a monopolist in the market for mining and production of nickel and palladium in Russia. In addition, Vladimir Potanin, the corporation’s CEO, has been placed on sanctions lists of the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom.

There have also been no sanctions imposed on the import of precious stones, nor on the Russian state company Alrosa, which is engaged in their extraction. According to Eurostat, last year the EU purchased Russian diamonds worth 1.4 billion euros.

Imports of aluminum and associated products from Russia to the EU actually increased in 2022 when compared to the previous year, jumping by 14 % to 2.8 billion Euro. The Russian aluminum monopoly Rusal has not been sanctioned by the EU, although its founder and head Oleg Deripaska is on US and UK sanctions lists. Despite the absence of official sanctions against the company, some large consumers, such as Boeing and Norsk Hydro, are refusing supplies from Rusal.

Copper imports from Russia to the EU in 2022 likewise did not decrease compared to 2021 and amounted to 2.8 billion euros. None of the three largest Russian copper producers, Norilsk Nickel, Ural Mining and Metallurgical Company and Russian Copper Company, are under EU sanctions.

Supporting the war — and pollution

The continued import of commodities from Russia not only indirectly finances Russian aggression in Ukraine, but also contributes to serious environmental pollution within Russia itself — which spreads beyond its borders and contributes to climate change.

A glance at the list of industrial facilities that have a negative impact on the environment — belonging to the 1st, highest hazard category — shows that a significant fraction of them are enterprises that manufacture products imported by the EU. The enterprises on this list constitute at least 60 % of Russia’s total pollution emissions.

Of the 300 enterprises comprising the list, 75 engage in oil and gas production and oil refining, 19 produce steel and other ferrous metal products, seven are aluminum industry facilities, five are copper facilities, four are mining and nickel production facilities, and 11 are chemical industry and fertilizer production sites.

According to the Russian State report on the state of the environment in 2021, emissions of pollutants into the atmosphere from stationary sources increased by 1.5% compared to the level of 2020 (16,951,500 tons) and amounted to 17,207,700 tons. tons. Over the past eight years, the level of emissions has not changed significantly. The discharge of wastewater into surface water bodies from processing industries in 2021 amounted to 2641.9 million m3, of which 65.3% are polluted; wastewater discharge from mining amounted to 1,394.2 million m3, of which 32.4% was polluted.

In 2021, 84.5% of all harmful air emissions from Russian enterprises came from ten industries. Energy companies traditionally emit the largest number of pollutants into the atmosphere (3.1 million tons of pollutants, or 17.8% of the emissions of enterprises that reported their emissions), in second place is oil and gas production (2.6 million tons, or 15.1%), the third is the extraction of metal ores (2.1 million tons, or 12.4%).

This is followed by coal mining (1.51 million tons, or 8.8%), transport enterprises and pipelines (1.5 million tons, or 8.7%), metallurgy (1.4 million tons, or 8.1%), production of coke and oil products (667 thousand tons, or 3.9%).

Surface and ground waters are also affected by pollution. According to the State Report, 4,506 sites of groundwater pollution have been identified. Pollution of 1,587 sites (35% of the total) is associated with the activities of industrial enterprises. The main substances polluting groundwater are nitrogen compounds (nitrates, nitrites, ammonia or ammonium, found at 1,944 sites), oil products (at 902 sites), sulfates and chlorides (at 670 sites), heavy metals (at 338 sites) and phenols (at 56 sites).

It is difficult to find publicly available statistics on individual types of production, but some companies have published reports, which, among other things, include data on emissions and discharge of pollutants.

For oil and gas production, such statistics are available in the State Report. In 2021, compared to 2020, gross emissions into the atmosphere decreased by 1.1% and amounted to 4.2 million tons of pollutants, which is 24% of the total emissions of pollutants from stationary sources. Most are carbon dioxide and methane. At the same time, the decrease in the volume of captured and neutralized substances amounted to 8.7%. Discharge of used water increased by 1.5% to 844 million m3, although water withdrawal decreased by 4.5%. The area of reclaimed land has decreased. The volume of generated waste increased by 6.5%. The number of accidents also increased from 14 in 2020 to 17 in 2021. As a result of accidents in 2021, 2,500 thousand m2 of the surface of water bodies and 7.3 hectares of land were affected.

The 2021 Sustainability Report produced by aluminum giant Rusal includes values for atmospheric emissions of pollutants in 2019, 2020 and 2021. The volume of emissions for this period increased from 348,000 tons to 368,900 tons. During the same period, emissions of carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides increased. The volume of hazardous waste generated over this period also failed to decrease. In 2019, these volumes amounted to 500,000 tons; in 2020, 800,000 tons, and in 2021, 700,000 tons.

The company claims that owing to the completion of a closed water circulation system at the Krasnoturinsk aluminum refinery, the volume of wastewater in 2021 decreased by 24.5% compared to 2020, amounting to 171.2 million m3 — 36% of which is polluted. At the same time, the total volume of water intake (178.4 million m3) did not decrease compared to the previous two years.

Data from the Norilsk Nickel Sustainability Report show a 16% decrease in polluting emissions in 2021 compared to the previous four years, amounting to 1,646,900 tons (or 9% of total emissions from stationary sources). The two main factors that reduced Norilsk Nickel’s emissions are the temporary suspension of mining and processing operations at the Polar Division and the implementation of a program to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions at the Kola Mining and Metallurgical Plant. Sulfur dioxide is the main pollutant, accounting for 97% of all of Norilsk Nickel’s air emissions.

The company’s wastewater volume, after a significant increase in 2020, slightly decreased in 2021 and amounted to 176.8 million m3. The volume of water intake fluctuates from year to year, but there is no notable decrease. In 2021, because of the company’s activities, 207 hectares of land were disturbed; as a result, the total area of disturbed lands amounted to 16,581 ha. Land reclamation has not been carried out. The volume of waste in 2021 increased by 7% compared to 2020 and amounted to 156.5 million tons.

As is well known, environmental pollution respects no borders, so pollutants entering the air or water in Russia migrate to neighboring countries. According to the State Report, the most common pollutants in water bodies on the border of the Russian Federation with neighboring states are:

with Norway – compounds of nickel, copper, manganese, mercury;

with Finland – difficult to oxidize organic substances, as per their chemical oxygen demand, or COD (hereafter referred to as organic matter, or OM), compounds of copper, iron;

with Estonia – OM, copper compounds; with Lithuania and Poland – OM, easily oxidizable organic substances according to the biochemical demands of water (hereafter volatile organic compounds, or VOC), iron compounds, nitrite nitrogen;

with the Republic of Belarus – OM, VOC, compounds of iron, copper, manganese, zinc;

with Ukraine — OM, VOC, compounds of iron, manganese, sulfates;

with Azerbaijan — copper compounds, oil products;

with Kazakhstan — OM, VOC, compounds of copper, manganese, sulfates; with Mongolia – organic matter, compounds of iron, manganese;

with China – OM, VOC, compounds of iron, copper, aluminum, vanadium.

Russian companies, both those that have fallen under direct sanctions, and those that have managed to avoid them, are now having a difficult time selling their goods, dealing with logistics and raising debt capital on international markets. This likely means that efforts to modernize production in order to reduce emissions and discharges will slow down or stop.

 

Source: Bellona

Related posts

Norway’s postponement of deep sea mining: A temporary relief, but a risk remains for ocean ecosystems

David Lazarevic

ABB report highlights Australian and global mining industry’s progress towards sustainability and decarbonisation

David Lazarevic

Environmental groups challenge Serbia’s approval of Rio Tinto’s Jadar mining project

David Lazarevic
error: Content is protected !!